SEO May 2020 Update - Google Webmaster

Share:

Each day, Google usually releases one or more changes designed to enhance our search results. Most aren’t noticeable but help us incrementally still improve.

Sometimes, an update could also be more noticeable. google aim to verify such updates once google feel there's actionable information that webmasters, content producers or others might absorb reference to them. for instance , when our “Speed Update” happened, google gave months of advanced notice and advice.


Several times a year, google make significant, broad changes to our search algorithms and systems. google ask these as “core updates.” They’re designed to make sure that overall, google’re delivering on our mission to present relevant and authoritative content to searchers. These core updates can also affect Google Discover.

Google confirm broad core updates because they typically produce some widely notable effects. Some sites may note drops or gains during them. google all know those with sites that have drops are going to be trying to find a fix, and that google want to make sure they don’t attempt to fix the incorrect things. Moreover, there won't be anything to repair in the least .

Get to know the quality rater guidelines & E-A-T, May 2020 SEO Update


Core updates & reassessing content

There’s nothing wrong with pages which will perform less well during a core update. They haven’t violated our webmaster guidelines nor been subjected to a manual or algorithmic action, as can happen to pages that do violate those guidelines. In fact, there’s nothing during a core update that targets specific pages or sites. Instead, the changes are about improving how our systems assess content overall. These changes may cause some pages that were previously under-rewarded to try to to better.

One way to consider how a core update operates is to imagine you made an inventory of the highest 100 movies in 2015. a couple of years later in 2019, you refresh the list. It’s getting to naturally change. Some new and wonderful movies that never existed before will now be candidates for inclusion. you would possibly also reassess some films and realize they deserved a better place on the list than that they had before.

The list will change, and films previously higher on the list that move down aren’t bad. There are simply more deserving films that are coming before them.

Focus on content

As explained, pages that drop after a core update don’t have anything wrong to repair . This said, we understand those that do less well after a core update change should feel they have to try to to something. we propose that specialize in ensuring you’re offering the simplest content you'll . That’s what our algorithms seek to reward.

A start line is to revisit the recommendation we’ve offered within the past on the way to self-assess if you think you’re offering quality content. We’ve updated that advice with a fresh set of inquiries to ask yourself about your content:

Content and quality questions



  • Does the content provide original information, reporting, research or analysis?
  • Does the content provide a substantial, complete or comprehensive description of the topic?
  • Does the content provide insightful analysis or interesting information that is beyond obvious?
  • If the content draws on other sources, does it avoid simply copying or rewriting those sources and instead provide substantial additional value and originality?
  • Does the headline and/or page title provide a descriptive, helpful summary of the content?
  • Does the headline and/or page title avoid being exaggerating or shocking in nature?
  • Is this the sort of page you’d want to bookmark, share with a friend, or recommend?
  • Would you expect to see this content in or referenced by a printed magazine, encyclopedia or book?

Expertise questions



  • Does the content present information in a way that makes you want to trust it, such as clear sourcing, evidence of the expertise involved, background about the author or the site that publishes it, such as through links to an author page or a site’s About page?
  • If you researched the site producing the content, would you come away with an impression that it is well-trusted or widely-recognized as an authority on its topic?
  • Is this content written by an expert or enthusiast who demonstrably knows the topic well?
  • Is the content free from easily-verified factual errors?
  • Would you feel comfortable trusting this content for issues relating to your money or your life?

Presentation and production questions



  • Is the content free from spelling or stylistic issues?
  • Was the content produced well, or does it appear sloppy or hastily produced?
  • Is the content mass-produced by or outsourced to a large number of creators, or spread across a large network of sites, so that individual pages or sites don’t get as much attention or care?
  • Does the content have an excessive amount of ads that distract from or interfere with the main content?
  • Does content display well for mobile devices when viewed on them?

Comparative questions

  • Does the content provide substantial value when compared to other pages in search results?
  • Does the content seem to be serving the genuine interests of visitors to the site or does it seem to exist solely by someone attempting to guess what might rank well in search engines?
  • Beyond asking yourself these questions, consider having others you trust but who are unaffiliated with your site provide an honest assessment.


Also consider an audit of the drops you may have experienced. What pages were most impacted and for what types of searches? Look closely at these to understand how they’re assessed against some of the questions above.

No comments

Please don't spam, comment your view.

Web Development